ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Effectiveness of magnetic seizure therapy versus electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive episode in China: protocol for a double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06409325 (Effectiveness of Magnetic Seizure Therapy Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for Major Depressive Episode), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of Magnetic Seizure Therapy Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for Major Depressive Episode
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been a cornerstone in treating Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), demonstrating high efficacy but often limited by cognitive side effects. As an alternative, magnetic seizure therapy (MST) has emerged, offering comparable antidepressant effects with potentially fewer cognitive adverse outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cognitive impact of MST and ECT. This multicenter, double-blind, parallel, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial will be conducted at seven clinical centers. Participants diagnosed with MDD will be randomly allocated to either the ECT or MST group. Each center aims to recruit 30 participants, resulting in a total sample size of 210. The intervention includes 12 sessions over 4 weeks, followed by 12-week follow-up. Assessments (the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-24), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), 8 cognitive tests, Electroencephalography, electrocardiography) occur at baseline, post-sessions 3/6/9/12 (3 hours after each session), and 4-/8-/12-week follow-ups. The primary outcome is the change in HDRS-24 total score from baseline to the 12-week follow-up, which is assessed after the completion of the 12-session acute treatment phase (conducted over 4 weeks) and a subsequent 12-week post-treatment observation period. Randomization and blinding protocols will be strictly followed to ensure unbiased treatment administration and assessment. This trial aims to provide robust evidence that MST is as effective as ECT in reducing depressive symptoms (assessed via HDRS-24) and to confirm its superior cognitive safety, with the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised as an additional primary outcome to evaluate verbal memory changes. Remaining cognitive measures will serve as secondary outcomes. Exploratory analyses will examine electroencephalography and electrocardiography data to identify potential neurophysiological biomarkers. If successful, this trial could significantly influence clinical practices and improve seizure treatment for patients with MDD. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT06409325.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.