ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Unilateral pulmonary edema after minimally-invasive redo-double valve replacement procedure-case report.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes a patient with a history of mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacements who developed prosthetic valve stenosis years later and underwent a minimally invasive, thoracoscopic-assisted double valve re-replacement. Postoperatively, the patient developed a rare but life-threatening re-expansion pulmonary edema (RPE), which led to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with rapid deterioration into refractory hypoxemia. Despite comprehensive conventional supportive management-including lung-protective ventilation, diuresis, anti-inflammatory therapy, and other measures-adequate oxygenation could not be maintained. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) was emergently initiated. With ECMO support, the patient's lungs were able to rest and recover. After 10 days of support, ECMO was successfully discontinued, and the patient eventually recovered and was discharged. This case aims to explore the pathophysiological mechanisms of RPE, management strategies for complications following minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and to emphasize the critical role of VV-ECMO in treating refractory respiratory failure, as well as the importance of multidisciplinary team (MDT) collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.