Evidence mapPaperPMID 41210338Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

From patterns to prognosis: machine learning-derived clusters in advanced heart failure.

Murat Karaçam, Barkın Kültürsay, Deniz Mutlu, Seda Tanyeri, Azmican Kaya, Süleyman Çagan Efe, Cem Doğan, Gülümser Sevgin Halil, Özgür Yaşar Akbal, Kaan Kırali and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Murat KaraçamDepartment of Cardiology, Bitlis State Hospital, Bitlis, Türkiye.
Barkın KültürsayDepartment of Cardiology, Tunceli State Hospital, Tunceli, Türkiye.
Deniz MutluCenter for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Seda TanyeriDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Azmican KayaDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Süleyman Çagan EfeDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cem DoğanDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Gülümser Sevgin HalilDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Özgür Yaşar AkbalDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Kaan KıraliDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Rezzan Deniz AcarDepartment of Cardiology, Kartal Kosuyolu Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Advanced heart failure (HF) is a clinically heterogeneous condition with poor prognosis, and traditional classification systems often fail to capture the complexity needed for personalized care. This study aimed to identify clinically meaningful phenotypic subgroups among patients with advanced HF using unsupervised machine learning and to evaluate their association with long-term outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 524 patients with advanced HF who underwent comprehensive clinical, echocardiographic, hemodynamic, and cardiopulmonary exercise assessments. Using k-means clustering on standardized, multidimensional data, two distinct phenotypes were identified. The primary composite outcome was defined as all-cause mortality, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation. Associations between cluster assignment and outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: The first cluster, representing patients with relatively preserved hemodynamics and functional status, was associated with a more favorable prognosis, while the second cluster included older individuals with significant biventricular dysfunction, higher pulmonary pressures, and poorer exercise capacity. These patients experienced a markedly higher rate of the composite outcome over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, with Cluster 2 showing a significantly increased risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.84; 95% CI: 2.72-5.43; Conclusion: Machine learning-based clustering revealed two distinct phenotypes in advanced HF with differing clinical features and prognoses. This approach may enhance risk stratification and inform individualized therapeutic strategies in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

advanced heart failuremachine learningphenotypingrisk stratificationunsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID41210338
PMCPMC12589050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.