Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210392›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

What Do Undergraduate Medical Students Value in Plastic Surgery Conferences?

Parth Ankur Tagdiwala, Aman Sawat Sahoo, Monther Salman, Rim Hachem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parth Ankur TagdiwalaFrom the Division of Medicine, University College London Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
Aman Sawat SahooUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Monther SalmanUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Rim HachemUniversity of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students often have misconceptions about plastic surgery, and improving undergraduate education in the field remains a priority. Conferences-delivered in-person or online-are commonly used to enhance access and awareness. However, there is limited literature on (1) student interest in oncoplastic breast surgery and (2) what medical students value in plastic surgery conference education. Methods: In collaboration with the Association of Breast Surgery, we organized 6 hybrid-format lectures focused on breast surgery. Attendees completed optional pre- and postconference surveys, which were analyzed statistically. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a random sample of 30 respondents and thematically analyzed. Results: The event was attended by 111 medical students, with 102 completing both surveys. There was a statistically significant increase in interest in oncology, plastic surgery, and oncoplastic breast surgery following the conference ( Conclusions: Conferences effectively promote interest and awareness of plastic surgery among medical students. Although in-person formats offer greater interactivity, virtual events provide accessible and scalable alternatives. Future research should focus on developing longitudinal educational initiatives and evaluating the long-term influence of undergraduate events on career decision-making in plastic surgery.

Identifiers

PMID41210392
PMCPMC12594307

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.