Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41210672›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc2025

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Review of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Adekemi Adeyemi, Lorin Berman, Mark Staroselsky, Dessiree Cordero, Ofek Hai, Amgad N Makaryus, Roman Zeltser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adekemi AdeyemiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Lorin BermanDepartment of Cardiology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Mark StaroselskyDepartment of Cardiology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Dessiree CorderoDepartment of Cardiology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Ofek HaiDepartment of Cardiology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York.
Amgad N MakaryusDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-7230
Roman ZeltserDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains a cornerstone in the management of complex coronary artery disease (CAD), offering significant improvements in both survival and quality of life. This review evaluates the short- and long-term outcomes associated with CABG. Despite its benefits, CABG carries perioperative complications, including atrial fibrillation, acute kidney injury, stroke, and surgical site infection. While early mortality rates, including in-hospital and 30-day outcomes, are comparable to those observed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), long-term data often favor CABG in specific patient populations. Multiple studies have demonstrated superior long-term survival with CABG over PCI in patients with multivessel disease, left main CAD, and comorbid conditions such as diabetes mellitus. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are significantly influenced by patient-specific risk factors, such as advanced age, female sex, reduced ejection fraction, and elevated biomarkers (e.g., troponin, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein). Since its introduction in the 1960s, CABG techniques have evolved with off-pump and minimally invasive approaches offering reduced hospital length of stay, shorter intensive care unit duration, and lower transfusion requirements, while maintaining comparable safety and efficacy to conventional on-pump surgery. In addition, graft selection is an important determinant of long-term success of CABG. In conclusion, CABG continues to be a highly effective revascularization strategy. Surgical technique, graft type, and careful patient selection remain essential to optimizing both perioperative safety and long-term outcome.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graftingcoronary artery diseasegraft patencylong-term survivalperioperative complicationspostoperative mortalitysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41210672
PMCPMC12591714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.