ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Surgical Techniques and Indications for Intraocular Lens Explantation: A Narrative Review.
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances and Challenges in Sulcus-Implanted Intraocular Lenses: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the outcomes of cataract surgery are remarkably positive, complications do still occur, some of which require intraocular lens (IOL) explantation. These complications often include corneal endothelial loss for anterior chamber IOLs, whereas posterior chamber IOLs are usually explanted because of dislocation, opacification, or patient dissatisfaction with visual quality. Surgical management is challenging, with numerous IOL types/methods of implantation requiring different techniques for explantation. En bloc removal is the simplest of techniques, requiring large incisions with large rates of astigmatism. While folding and cutting methods allow for smaller incisions, the extensive manipulation these techniques require do lead to the potential for endothelial trauma. More novel methods such as cartridge-assisted extraction or IOL scaffolding theoretically minimize anterior chamber manipulation and risk of IOL prolapse into the vitreous but are less widely reviewed with few ophthalmologists having experience with the techniques. If the lens has become displaced into the vitreous, one can also cleave the lens prior to moving it the anterior chamber of the eye, thus even more greatly minimizing corneal endothelial damage. Ultimately, the variety of techniques paired with the rarity of explantation make it difficult to develop expertise in each of these many surgical methodologies. Therefore, it is important to review the indications, complications, general principles, and specific steps for each of the approaches to IOL explantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.