ArticleiScience2025
Robust calibration and quantification of FRET signals using multiplexed biosensor barcoding.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Protocol for multiplexed quantification of fluorescent biosensor FRET efficiency using barcoded cells.STAR protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescent proteins (FPs) underpins many genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors for monitoring biochemical activities in live cells. However, the FRET ratio (acceptor-to-donor signal ratio), commonly used as a proxy for FRET efficiency, is highly sensitive to imaging parameters, complicating data interpretation. Using FP-based barcodes, we introduced calibration standards into subsets of cells for normalization of fluorescence signals. Theoretical analysis indicated the need for both high- and low-FRET standards for calibration under different excitation intensities. We validated this prediction using engineered "FRET-ON" and "FRET-OFF" standards, demonstrating that calibrated FRET ratios are independent of imaging conditions. Including donor-only and acceptor-only cells enabled simultaneous determination of FRET efficiency for multiple biosensors. Calibration also restored expected reciprocal changes in donor and acceptor signals, often obscured by imaging fluctuations and photobleaching. Together, our studies introduce a simple strategy for robust, multiplexed FRET biosensor imaging, facilitating cross-experimental and long-term studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.