ArticlemHealth2025
Factors associated with intention to use an educative mHealth application among high-risk target groups in health prevention.
Article in mHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An unhealthy and sedentary lifestyle is widespread in industrialized countries, increasing chronic disease risks and potentially leading to a systemic crisis in nursing and elder care. Mobile health (mHealth) applications offer a promising solution by promoting health literacy and supporting holistic, health-oriented lifestyles. However, little is known about the factors influencing the intended use of such applications among individuals with an urgent need for preventive action. This study therefore aims to investigate behavioral intention (BI) to use a chatbot-based mHealth application designed to enhance health literacy and support balanced approaches to physical activity, nutrition, and stress management. Specifically, it seeks to identify key determinants influencing intention to use the application among individuals with high prevention needs, in order to inform the design of engaging and sustainable digital health interventions. Methods: A quantitative survey design based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) model was applied to examine determinants of BI to use the Digital Health Companion (DHC), a chatbot-based mHealth application. The model variables included performance expectancy (PE), hedonic motivation (HM), social influence (SI), effort expectancy (EE), and facilitating conditions (FC). In addition, potential moderating effects of age, gender, prior mHealth experience, educational status, and health literacy were assessed using supplementary questionnaires. Results: Data from 105 participants (58 female; 38.4 years) with need for action in the area of physical activity, nutrition, or stress management were analyzed. Results indicate that PE and HM significantly influence BI (P<0.001), while SI shows the least influence (P=0.26) as well as the lowest score overall and therefore has the highest potential to strengthen BI as social functions were enhanced. Factors such as age, gender, prior experience with mHealth applications, or educational status did not influence BI. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for engaging, user-friendly mHealth applications that motivate preventive health measures, reducing future care dependency. Users must be convinced of the personal health benefits (PE) of the application and experience a certain degree of enjoyment (HM) while using it. The integration of social features however, especially in cooperation with health insurance companies, is restricted by stringent data protection regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.