Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211140›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in healthy individuals, stroke, and Parkinson's disease: a narrative review of safety, parameters, and efficacy.

Machiko Matsuoka, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Toshiyuki Fujiwara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Machiko MatsuokaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Juntendo University Graduate School of Health Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomofumi YamaguchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiyuki FujiwaraDepartment of Physical Therapy, Juntendo University Graduate School of Health Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the noninvasive electrical stimulation methods, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) regulates the activity of various neural networks in the brain and autonomic nervous system and is expected to be applied clinically in many areas, including in patients with central nervous system, psychiatric, and cardiac diseases. Although systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on safety and efficacy, the variability of stimulation parameters and the lack of consistency in their effects remain significant issues. Therefore, the present study aimed to provide a comprehensive view of the safety, parameters, and efficacy of taVNS by focusing on studies in healthy participants, patients with stroke, and patients with Parkinson's disease. A literature search was conducted from October 14 to 25 November 2024, using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The following search terms were used: "noninvasive VNS or nVNS or noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation," "transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation or tVNS," and "transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation or taVNS." In total, 154 papers were included, of which 139 were on healthy participants, nine on patients with stroke, and six on patients with Parkinson's disease. The safety of taVNS was relatively high. Although minor side effects were reported, no serious adverse events were attributed to taVNS parameters used. taVNS could regulate brain activity, motor and mental functions, and autonomic nervous system activity in patients with stroke and Parkinson's disease. Modulation of the autonomic nervous system and cortical excitability was also observed in healthy individuals. However, these effects may depend on the stimulation parameters. The lack of reports on safety and the stimulation parameters used was also highlighted. Further validation of parameters and accumulation of evidence regarding the efficacy of taVNS are necessary.

Indexed as

central nervous system disorderneuromodulationnoninvasive brain stimulationrehabilitationtaVNS

Identifiers

PMID41211140
PMCPMC12593472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.