ArticleCardiac failure review2025
Cardiovascular Benefits of Spironolactone in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights from a Win Ratio Analysis of the TOPCAT Trial.
Article in Cardiac failure review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent heart failure (HF) trials, the win ratio statistical approach, developed to address the limitations of conventional methods, has been increasingly applied to better capture clinical benefits. The TOPCAT study was a randomised controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of spironolactone in patients with HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45%. This study evaluated the cardiovascular benefits of spironolactone according to their clinical importance using the win ratio method. Methods: A post hoc analysis was conducted using data from the TOPCAT Americas cohort. The primary outcome was a hierarchical composite comprising the time to cardiovascular death, time to first aborted cardiac arrest, time to first hospitalisation for HF, time to first hospitalisation for arrhythmia and change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall summary score at 36 months. Outcomes were analysed using the win ratio statistical model. Results: In all, 1,767 patients were included; 886 were assigned to receive spironolactone and 881 to receive placebo. Hierarchical analysis of the primary composite outcome revealed a significant higher probability of win (28.3%) compared to loss (23.1%) in the spironolactone group, yielding a win ratio of 1.22 (95% CI [1.05-1.42]; p=0.008) and a net clinical benefit (win difference) of 5.2% (95% CI [1.36-9.04]). Detailed assessment of the win differences revealed a concordant positive benefit (win difference >0) across all components of the outcome hierarchy. Subgroup analyses indicated no significant effect of age (<75 years versus ≥75 years), sex (male versus female) or LVEF (<50% versus ≥50%) on the efficacy of spironolactone (p for interaction>0.05). Conclusion: This post hoc analysis, using a novel statistical approach, demonstrates the consistent benefits of spironolactone across adverse cardiovascular events, patient symptoms, functional status and quality of life in individuals with HF and mildly reduced or preserved LVEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.