Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211313›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Ângela Lima, Joana Castro, Christina A Muzny, Nuno Cerca

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ângela LimaLaboratory of Research in Biofilms Rosário Oliveira (LIBRO), Centre of Biological Engineering (CEB), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
Joana CastroLABBELS - Associate Laboratory, Braga, Portugal.
Christina A MuznyDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Nuno CercaLaboratory of Research in Biofilms Rosário Oliveira (LIBRO), Centre of Biological Engineering (CEB), University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common vaginal infection in reproductive-age women. It is associated with adverse pregnancy complications, such as preterm birth and low birth weight, in addition to an increased risk of acquisition of HIV and sexually transmitted infections. BV is characterized by a vaginal dysbiosis, involving loss of protective Methods: Adhesion assays of dual combinations of Results: Our results revealed synergy between different Conclusions: Although this

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionGardnerellaLactobacillus crispatusVaginosis, BacterialFemaleGardnerella vaginalisHeLa CellsHumansMicrobiotaVaginaBacterial vaginosisGardnerella spp.HeLa cell adhesion assayHypothesis testing in microbiota researchLactobacillus crispatusLactobacillus displacementMicrobial synergismsPathogen competitionPolymicrobial biofilmQuantitative PCR (qPCR)

Identifiers

PMID41211313
PMCPMC12595946

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.