Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211419›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Advances in modelling the risk of benign and malignant lung nodules.

Shang Du, Tangwei Wu, Hui Wang, Zheqiong Tan, Zhongxin Lu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shang DuSchool of Laboratory Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Tangwei WuDepartment of Medical Laboratory, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Medical Laboratory, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zheqiong TanDepartment of Medical Laboratory, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhongxin LuSchool of Laboratory Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung nodules are critical indicators for early lung cancer detection, yet accurately distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions remains a clinical challenge. This review summarizes advances in predictive models for lung nodule risk assessment, spanning classical clinical-imaging models, biomarker-based approaches, and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools. While classical models provide a foundational framework, their performance often varies across populations. Biomarkers and AI models significantly enhance diagnostic precision by capturing molecular and imaging features imperceptible to the human eye. However, issues such as generalizability, standardization, and data security persist. The most promising direction lies in multimodal integration, combining clinical, imaging, biomarker, and AI data to achieve superior accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) >0.90. Future efforts should focus on multi-center validation, standardized biomarker assays, and data secure, scalable AI systems to translate these innovations into routine clinical practice, enabling personalized and early lung cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

applicationbiomarkerlung cancerlung nodulepredictive model

Identifiers

PMID41211419
PMCPMC12588858

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.