Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41211427›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Vacuum-assisted excision: one-step approach to the diagnosis and percutaneous treatment of small early breast cancer (the VAE-BREAST 01 study protocol).

Henrique Lima Couto, Bertha Andrade Coelho, Bernardo Ferreira de Paula Ricardo, Paola Hartung Toppa, Aleida Nazareth Soares, Bruna Torres Silvestre da Silva, Douglas de Miranda Pires, Tereza Cristina de Oliveira Ferreira, Paula Clarke, Shirley das Graças Ferreira and 27 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors.

Henrique Lima CoutoRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bertha Andrade CoelhoBrazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bernardo Ferreira de Paula RicardoAnatomia Laboratory, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paola Hartung ToppaFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Aleida Nazareth SoaresFaculty of Medical Sciences of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bruna Torres Silvestre da SilvaRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Douglas de Miranda PiresRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Tereza Cristina de Oliveira FerreiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paula ClarkeRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Shirley das Graças FerreiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Larissa Barbosa OliveiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Romana Giordani Ribeiro SalibaRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Paula Cristina Martins SoaresRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Thais Paiva MoraesRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Ana Carolina Guglielmelli MendonçaRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Amanda Cristina Braga de OliveiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Daniela Rodrigues SiqueiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jane Sanglard de OliveiraRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Charles Andreé Joseph de PaduaCetus Oncology Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Geraldo Felício CunhaCetus Oncology Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Marcus Simões CastilhoRadiocare, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bárbara Pace Silva Assis CarvalhoBrazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gabriel de Almeida SilvaBrazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Waldeir José de Almeida JúniorBrazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Clecio Ênio Murta de LucenaBrazilian Society of Mastology, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Eduardo Carvalho PessoaSão Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, School of Medicine, Botucatu, Brazil.
Annamaria Massahud Rodrigues Dos SantosOrizonti Institute, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Heverton Leal Ernesto de AmorimUD Diagnosis, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Ruffo Freitas-JuniorFederal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Marcus Nascimento BorgesFederal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Andre MattarWomen Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo AntoniniHospital of the State Public Servant of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel de Araújo Brito ButtrosSão Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, School of Medicine, Botucatu, Brazil.
Lorena Lima Coto DominguezRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Bruna PiresRedimama-Redimasto, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Carolina Nazareth ValadaresHospital Paulistano, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Marcos Dos ReisFederal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) of breast lesions is a technique used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes and is performed on an outpatient basis, with local anesthesia and image guidance. Currently, VAE is used in the management of benign lesions and lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3 lesions). More recently, there has been interest in VAE for the percutaneous treatment of small breast cancers, the aim of which was to reduce morbidity and aggressive surgical treatment. Due to how conventional VAE is performed, histopathological assessment of the resection margins is not possible. Obtaining free margins after a breast cancer resection is a primary objective in the surgical treatment of this disease. If VAE could ensure free margins and the absence of residual tumor in the surgical excision, it would represent a safe method for a minimally invasive treatment, providing an effective percutaneous treatment of small early breast cancers. Methods: The prospective VAE-BREAST 01 study explores the role of VAE associated with cavity margin sample shaving (CMSH) as a one-step approach in the diagnosis and complete excision of small breast tumors, ensuring the absence of residual disease in surgical pathology. Women with lesions smaller than 1.5 cm, ACR BI-RADS™ (American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) category 4 or 5, and identified by screening or clinical alteration are included. Multifocal, multicentric breast cancers and breast cancers associated with diffuse and extensive calcifications are excluded. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the false-negative and false-positive rates of VAE+CMSH for the complete excision of breast cancers will be calculated. The collected data also will include patients' demographics, image characteristics of the lesions, information regarding the VAE+CMSH and surgical procedure, biopsy and surgical pathology, and data on side effects, patient acceptance, cosmetic results, and patients' experiences during VAE. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP). Participants will provide written informed consent, and researchers will follow institutional guidelines for data collection and management. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/, identifier U1111-1301-4235.

Indexed as

de-escalationearly breast cancerminimally invasive treatmentprecision oncologyvacuum assisted excision

Identifiers

PMID41211427
PMCPMC12591974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.