ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Real-world safety profile of sonidegib: a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sonidegib is a novel treatment for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (LaBCC) with demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials. However, its real-world safety profile remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to evaluate the real-world safety of sonidegib by analyzing adverse event (AE) reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), identifying both known and unexpected safety signals. Methods: Data for this study were obtained from the FAERS, covering the period from the third quarter of 2015 to the fourth quarter of 2024. Four disproportionality analysis methods were employed to detect positive signals associated with sonidegib, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Additionally, time-to-onset (TTO) analysis of AEs was conducted, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 1,087 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) involving 2,496 adverse events were included. The analysis confirmed the occurrence of known AEs, such as muscle spasms and myalgia, while also identifying several unexpected AEs, including pneumonia, sepsis, urinary tract infection, and hyperkalemia. Conclusions: This study analyzed the real-world safety of sonidegib and emphasized the importance of continuous monitoring during the early stages of treatment. These findings provide important safety information for clinicians, but further research is needed to validate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.