Observational studyCirculation. Genomic and precision medicine2026
Mavacamten Monotherapy in Real-World Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Evidence From COLLIGO-HCM.
Observational study in Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06372457 (mavaCamten ObservationaL evIdence Global cOnsortium in HCM), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
mavaCamten ObservationaL evIdence Global cOnsortium in HCM (COLLIGO-HCM)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of GLP-1 receptor agonist use with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMavacamten has been shown to improve cardiac function and symptoms in patients with symptomatic (New York Heart Association class II-III) obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Clinical studies suggest that mavacamten monotherapy is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile, but limited evidence exists regarding monotherapy in real-world studies. This analysis aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety outcomes of mavacamten monotherapy in the real-world COLLIGO-HCM study (Mavacamten ObservationaL Evidence Global Consortium in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy).
methodsPatient-level data recorded between April 2022 and February 2025 at 7 sites across 5 countries were extracted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of HCM from 2018 onwards were eligible for inclusion if they had ≥1 mavacamten prescription after the date of diagnosis. Patients were categorized based on background therapy status during mavacamten treatment: mavacamten monotherapy or mavacamten with background therapy (down-titration or no dose modification).
resultsOverall, 278 patients were included and received mavacamten (mavacamten monotherapy, n=88; mavacamten with background therapy, n=190). At month 9, most patients achieved ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement from baseline (mavacamten monotherapy, 60.0%; mavacamten with background therapy, 61.0%). Improvements in resting and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradients from baseline to month 9 were observed in both subgroups; mean left ventricular ejection fraction through month 9 remained ≥62.0% with mavacamten monotherapy and ≥61.4% with mavacamten with background therapy. Two patients in the mavacamten monotherapy subgroup and 1 patient in the mavacamten with background therapy subgroup permanently discontinued treatment owing to left ventricular ejection fraction <50%.
conclusionsMavacamten monotherapy was associated with improvements in cardiac function and symptoms, and positive benefits to the risk profile over a 9-month follow-up period; this was consistent with improvements observed in patients treated with mavacamten with background therapy. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT06372457.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.