ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: A review of preclinical and clinical data.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advancements in surgical and endovascular interventions and improved screening protocols, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains a progressive vascular condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality owing to rupture. However, the mechanisms underlying the progression of AAA are poorly understood. AAA progression is driven by complex biological mechanisms, including endothelial dysfunction, chronic inflammation, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, proteolytic activity, and vessel wall remodeling. Some studies highlight proteases like matrix metalloproteinases in ECM remodeling, while others focus on miRNAs regulating inflammation; risk factors such as smoking and hypertension further increase vascular wall stress and aneurysm growth. The lack of detailed understanding limits the development of targeted therapies and individual risk assessments. Risk-prediction models are promising; however these models require further external validation to ensure reliability and clinical applicability. Personalized approaches integrating biomechanics and advanced imaging may improve rupture risk assessment. However, trials of antibiotics and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors have shown limited benefit. Observational studies have suggested potential benefits of metformin and statins. Preclinical studies have proposed that targeting inflammatory pathways such as the NOD-like receptor P3 inflammasome is a novel therapeutic strategy to mitigate aneurysm progression. Furthermore, innovative nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems have been explored to deliver matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors directly to the aneurysm site to prevent aneurysm expansion while minimizing systemic side effects. Integrative research is urgently needed to clarify AAA progression, improve outcomes, and enable personalized detection of high-risk subthreshold AAAs while avoiding overtreatment of low-risk cases. This review consolidates current knowledge on AAA pathophysiology, epidemiology, and treatment challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.