ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Bidirectional causal association between cathepsins and neuropsychiatric disorders: univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization study.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeuropsychiatric disorders are among the most common diseases worldwide and are characterized by complex pathogenic mechanisms. Cathepsins (CTS) are crucially involved in the pathogenesis and treatment of numerous diseases. Increasing evidence suggests a relationship between cathepsins and neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the causal associations remain unclear.
methodsWe performed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, applying univariable (UVMR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) to evaluate the causal association between nine cathepsins and five neuropsychiatric disorders. Data for this study were derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The MR analysis primarily used five methods: Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW), Weighted Median Estimator (WME), MR-Egger regression, Simple mode, and Weighted mode. Additionally, sensitivity tests were employed to assess the robustness of the MR results.
resultsMR analyses indicated that CTSH is associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (UVMR: OR, 1.041; 95% CI, 1.013–1.069; p = 0.004; MVMR: OR, 1.040; 95% CI, 1.014–1.066; p = 0.003; replication UVMR: OR, 1.046; 95% CI, 1.014–1.082; p = 0.011). Findings that were significant in only one MR approach, such as the putative causal effects of CTSF on AD and bipolar disorder (BIP), of CTSL2 on major depressive disorder (MDD), and of CTSH and CTSE on Parkinson’s disease (PD) should be interpreted with caution.
conclusionCTSH can be considered a plasma biomarker for AD, offering new insights and potential directions for the prevention and treatment of AD. Additionally, during the treatment of BIP and PD, attention should be paid to CTSF and CTSE expression levels to maintain physiological homeostasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41212305What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.