ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Optimization of experimental designs for biological rhythm discovery.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Equally spaced temporal sampling is the standard protocol for the study of biological rhythms. These equispaced designs perform well when calibrated to an oscillator's period, yet can introduce systematic biases when applied to rhythms of unknown periodicity. Here, we investigate how optimizing the timing of measurements can improve rhythm detection across a range of experimental settings. When the period of a rhythm is known, we prove that equispaced designs provide optimal statistical power. In studies targeting specific sets of candidate rhythms, we construct optimal alternatives to equispaced designs to simultaneously maximize power at all frequencies under consideration. For studies investigating continuous period ranges, we show numerically how blindspots near the Nyquist rate can be resolved through timing optimization. Our computational methods are available through our PowerCHORD library. Our findings across all experimental contexts suggest that timing optimization is an effective yet under-explored tool for improving biological rhythm discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.