Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41212929›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Optimization of experimental designs for biological rhythm discovery.

Turner Silverthorne, Matthew Carlucci, Arturas Petronis, Adam R Stinchcombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Turner SilverthorneDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew CarlucciThe Krembil Family Epigenetics Laboratory, The Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arturas PetronisThe Krembil Family Epigenetics Laboratory, The Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adam R StinchcombeDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9082-4286

Funding

Future Biomedicine Charity Fund, Vilnius, LithuaniaKrembil Foundation, Toronto, CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equally spaced temporal sampling is the standard protocol for the study of biological rhythms. These equispaced designs perform well when calibrated to an oscillator's period, yet can introduce systematic biases when applied to rhythms of unknown periodicity. Here, we investigate how optimizing the timing of measurements can improve rhythm detection across a range of experimental settings. When the period of a rhythm is known, we prove that equispaced designs provide optimal statistical power. In studies targeting specific sets of candidate rhythms, we construct optimal alternatives to equispaced designs to simultaneously maximize power at all frequencies under consideration. For studies investigating continuous period ranges, we show numerically how blindspots near the Nyquist rate can be resolved through timing optimization. Our computational methods are available through our PowerCHORD library. Our findings across all experimental contexts suggest that timing optimization is an effective yet under-explored tool for improving biological rhythm discovery.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksModels, BiologicalPeriodicityResearch DesignAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumans

Identifiers

PMID41212929
PMCPMC12617917

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.