Evidence mapPaperPMID 41213680Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2025

Validation and cost-effectiveness of an mHealth tool for cognitive impairment detection in Peru: protocol for the IMPACT Salud observational study.

Maria Kathia Cardenas, Cecilia Anza-Ramirez, Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz, Nilton Custodio, Rosa Montesinos, Juan Jaime Miranda, Marco Da Re, Maria Veronica Belon-Hercilla, Maria Lazo-Porras, Jemma Hawkins and 8 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Maria Kathia CardenasNuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK maria.cardenas@ndph.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3173-9284
Cecilia Anza-RamirezCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-8252
Antonio Bernabe-OrtizCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6834-1376
Nilton CustodioUnidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Peru.
Rosa MontesinosUnidad de Diagnóstico de Deterioro Cognitivo y Prevención de Demencia, Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, Lima, Peru.
Juan Jaime MirandaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Marco Da ReDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Maria Veronica Belon-HercillaCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0723-9682
Maria Lazo-PorrasCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-5476
Jemma HawkinsSchool of Social Sciences, Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1998-9547
Francisco Diez-CansecoCRONICAS Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Graham MooreSchool of Social Sciences, Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-3978
William WhiteleyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4816-8991
Rafael A CalvoDyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Maria Sofia Cuba-FuentesCenter for Research in Primary Health Care, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7394-7092
Filipa LandeiroNuffield Department of Population Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2842-2195
Christopher R ButlerDepartment of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
IMPACT Salud Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia is a chronic and progressive neurological condition characterised by cognitive and functional impairment. It is often associated with multimorbidity and imposes a significant economic burden on healthcare systems and families, especially in low-income and middle-income countries. In Peru, where dementia cases are increasing rapidly, timely detection and referral for diagnosis is crucial. This protocol is part of the IMPACT Salud project in Peru. Here, we focus on a specific component aimed at validating an mHealth tool for the detection of cognitive and functional impairment and assessing its cost-effectiveness. We will also assess changes in cognitive and functional impairment as well as health economic outcomes over 1 year. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational study will be conducted in four geographically diverse regions of Peru. Community health workers are expected to contact approximately 32 000 participants (≥60 years) to apply an mHealth-enabled tool that includes cognitive and functional instruments: Ascertain Dementia 8, Peruvian version of Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire. From this large sample, we aim to find 3600 participants and their study partners to enrol and interview at baseline regarding sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyles, comorbidities and health economic data including resource use, costs and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Psychologists, blind to previous results, will assess dementia stage of the participants using an abbreviated Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale. At 6-month follow-up, participants will complete a brief health economics questionnaire on resource use, costs and HR-QoL. To validate the accuracy of the detection tool, a subsample of 600 participants who completed the baseline will undergo a gold-standard clinical neuropsychological assessment. This subsample will participate in a 12-month follow-up, including health economics, cognitive and functional impairment tests and the CDR scale. Results will be analysed and presented by cognitive status, site, sex and multimorbidity profile. Finally, data from all stages and external sources will inform a decision model to implement a cost-effectiveness analysis of the detection tool at the national level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received ethics approval in Peru (Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia: CONSTANCIA-CIEI-378-33-23) and in the UK (Imperial College London: ICREC/SETREC reference number 6647445). Informed consent will be obtained from participants and their study partners, considering the participant's capacity to consent. For illiterate participants, consent will be obtained through a witnessed procedure involving study partners, with a fingerprint obtained instead of a signature. The results will be disseminated through conferences, published articles, public presentations (particularly to those involved in dementia care) and presentations or meetings with local health authorities.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaTelemedicineAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicPeruAgingDementiaEPIDEMIOLOGYHEALTH ECONOMICSQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41213680
PMCPMC12598945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.