Evidence mapPaperPMID 41213702Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Protocol for a systematic review assessing the role of digital health technology in optimising medication adherence in older patients with asthma or COPD.

Aseel Mahmoud, Maguy Saffouh El Hajj, Bethan Mair Treadgold, Lorna Hardy, Sumayyah Khalid, Jane Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aseel MahmoudUniversity of Exeter Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Exeter, England, UK a.mahmoud@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6332-8239
Maguy Saffouh El HajjClinical Pharmacy and Practice, Qatar University College of Pharmacy, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0770-4679
Bethan Mair TreadgoldPrimary Care Research Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0255-7422
Lorna HardyFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Exeter, England, UK.
Sumayyah KhalidUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8866-6469
Jane SmithUniversity of Exeter Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Exeter, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn estimated 262 million people lived with asthma globally in 2019. Similarly, in 2021, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was responsible for 3.5% million global deaths. They are usually distinct disorders, but the Global Initiative Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2024 strategy document asserts that asthma and COPD are conditions that may coexist in an individual and may require specific personalised approaches and treatments. It is acknowledged that they may share some common treatable traits and clinical features There are many challenges to manage asthma and COPD in the older population, including poor adherence to prescribed medications and poor inhaler techniques. The overall aim of this systematic review is to identify, appraise and synthesise available evidence around digital health interventions used to improve medication adherence in older people with asthma or COPD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review will examine studies that evaluated digital health interventions for asthma or COPD in any setting (eg, primary or secondary care). To be included, studies must be reported in English, Arabic or French and published from the year 2000 onwards. A literature search will be performed in MEDLINE via Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO via Ovid to identify relevant articles published since 2000 and up to December 2024. No language restrictions will be applied.The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials will be used to assess the quality of retrieved randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies. The quality of cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Mixed-methods studies will be assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The quality of qualitative studies will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative checklist.Data will be synthesised using a convergent segregated approach, which involves an independent synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data leading to the generation of quantitative and qualitative evidence, which will then be integrated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not applicable for this study since no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Findings will be used in a bigger project aimed to answer the question on how to embed a pharmacist-led digital health service to support older people with asthma or COPD into the NHS (National Health Service) usual care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024575924.

Indexed as

AsthmaDigital HealthMedication AdherencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicTelemedicineAsthmaChronic airways diseaseDigital TechnologyFrail ElderlyMedication AdherenceReview

Identifiers

PMID41213702
PMCPMC12598943

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.