ArticleScientific reports2025
An emotion-oriented product evaluation model based on BP neural network and improved dempster-shafer theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the process of user emotion-oriented product development, emotion perception has become a crucial dimension in evaluating product design. Aiming to address the issues of subjectivity bias and insufficient efficiency in multi-source information fusion in existing methods, this study proposes a hybrid product evaluation framework that integrates a back-propagation (BP) neural network and an improved Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. The method constructs input vectors by combining product design features and user features. It utilizes multilayer BP networks to learn the nonlinear mapping relationship between product attributes and user emotions, thereby generating preliminary emotion perception probability assignments (BPA). To further address the issue of conflicting expert opinions, a weighting strategy based on the average distance of the evidence is introduced, and the D-S evidence fusion process is optimized. Ultimately, the improved evidence theory model can effectively unify the judgments of multiple experts and output a unified emotional evaluation result. The empirical study, with the sofa as the research object, shows that the proposed method can effectively identify key design elements and achieve quantitative evaluation in the emotional dimension. Through comparative experiments, this method demonstrates higher stability and adaptability in multi-source data processing and fusion accuracy, as well as good scalability, providing quantitative decision support for user-centered product design practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.