ArticleScientific reports2025
A computational model of coronary arteries with in-stent restenosis coupling hemodynamics and pharmacokinetics with growth mechanics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in stent technology, in-stent restenosis remains a critical challenge following percutaneous coronary intervention. In this work, we propose a comprehensive fluid-solid computational model to simulate restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. We develop a three-dimensional continuum-based framework that couples the complex interplay of hemodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and restenosis-induced arterial growth. Within the arterial wall, a continuum model of cell dynamics and tissue growth predicts neointimal thickening. Drug release is modeled by direct diffusion from the abluminal stent surface and one-way absorption of hydrophobic drug from the bloodstream at the lumen-wall interface. We incorporate blood flow influence into growth mechanics through the effect of non-physiological wall shear stresses on endothelial cells morphology. Due to the short time scale inherent in the fluid model, we adopt a quasi-steady approach that efficiently homogenizes hemodynamic-related quantities over clinically relevant time scales for restenosis and drug release. We verify the components of the computational model and the quasi-steady assumption using a test case with an idealized cylindrical artery and a one-ring stent. The framework is further extended to patient-specific geometries obtained from optical coherence tomography and virtual stent implantation. Our results showcase how stent design, drug elution, and hemodynamics can collectively modulate restenosis progression, and the proposed coupling framework could, in the long term, contribute to the development of clinical decision-support tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.