ArticleScientific reports2025
The fatigue status feature of bicycle movement based on deep learning and signal processing technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cycling is a common and effective home-based rehabilitation exercise. Accurate and accessible assessment of the onset of fatigue is essential to achieving optimal exercise benefits and preventing overuse injuries. To obtain fatigue-related parameters in different age groups, we applied deep learning algorithms and signal processing technology to analyze cycling movement features for the people aged over 45. 20 healthy adults aged over 45 and 20 aged 18-30 were recruited. Participants were asked to ride a stationary exercise bike at their self-regulated pedaling speeds for 10 min and wear a COSMED K5 device to collect physiological signals. The Keypoint RCNN (KR) algorithm and three signal processing methods (Fourier transform, short-time Fourier transform, and multiscale entropy analysis were used to analyze the cycling movement data. Based on time-frequency analysis, subjects' movement status change points were identified when fatigue occurred. Four movement status parameters were calculated, including the peak frequency before/after the movement status change point and the complexity index average (CIA) before/after the movement status change point. Inter-group and intra-group movement features, movement status, and physiological data were compared to determine fatigue-related features. Results showed that the peak frequency (p = 0.005), the peak frequency before/after the change point (p = 0.008/0.019), the CIA after the change point (p = 0.014), the maximum heart rate, maximal oxygen consumption, metabolic equivalents, and energy efficiency exhibited significant inter-group differences. The KR algorithm demonstrated outstanding performance in keypoint detection, achieving an accuracy of 86.5%, significantly outperforming OpenPose. With an inference speed of 30 FPS, it fulfills the demands for real-time monitoring. In addition, CIA valuses before and after change pointsshowed significant differences in the the middle-aged and elderly people group. After the change point, the CIA canidentify movement status changes in inter-group and intra-group comparisons, suggesting it can be used as a indicator of fatigue status, especially for people aged over 45.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.