Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41214187›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative performance of bagging and boosting ensemble models for predicting lumpy skin disease with multiclass-imbalanced data.

Hagar F Gouda, Fatma D M Abdallah

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hagar F GoudaAnimal Wealth Development Department (Biostatistics subdivision), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Sharkia, Egypt. hagarfathy@zu.edu.eg.
Fatma D M AbdallahAnimal Wealth Development Department (Biostatistics subdivision), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Sharkia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensemble machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as bagging and boosting, are powerful decision-support tools that enhance disease prediction and risk management in the veterinary field. Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD) poses a significant threat to livestock health and results in substantial economic losses. This study aims to predict LSD using 1,041 data records collected from six Egyptian governorates between June 2020 and October 2022. The dataset exhibits a multiclass imbalance with three outcome classes: Dead (6%), Diseased (32%), and Healthy (62%). To address this imbalance, we applied SMOTE, Random Oversampling (ROS), and Random Undersampling (RUS). Five ensemble models: Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting (GBoost), and XGBoost were evaluated on both imbalanced and balanced datasets, with hyperparameter tuning via grid search and 10-fold cross-validation. Our findings highlight the superior performance of the RF model combined with ROS (RF-ROS), achieving the highest accuracy (82%) and AUC (0.93), followed by balanced XGBoost (81.25%, AUC = 0.93). AdaBoost and GBoost also improved significantly after oversampling and tuning. SHAP analysis identified vaccination status as the most important predictor, emphasizing targeted interventions. These results demonstrate that combining resampling with hyperparameter tuning enhances ML performance on imbalanced veterinary data.

Indexed as

Lumpy Skin DiseaseMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleDecision TreesBaggingEnsemble learningLumpy skin diseaseMulti class imbalanceSMOTEVaccination

Identifiers

PMID41214187
PMCPMC12603216

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.