SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Investigating the prognostic value of non-coding RNAs in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic and miRNA-Target Pathway Analysis of the DLK1-DIO3 Imprinted microRNA Cluster in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-coding RNA (ncRNA) expression dysregulation has been implicated in the prognosis of various cancers. Several mechanisms have been associated with altered expression of the ncRNAs with the progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Based on the special properties that ncRNAs possess, including their stability, tissue specificity, and disease-associated dysregulation, a considerable amount of research has been conducted to identify their potential as non-invasive prognostic biomarkers.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted in WOS, Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Hazard ratios (HRs) were used to assess the prognostic value of ncRNA dysregulation in CLL. Risk of bias was evaluated with the QUIPS tool, and subgroup analyses were based on sample size and study quality. Publication bias was assessed using Egger’s, Begg’s, and Trim-and-Fill tests. Sensitivity analysis employed the leave-one-out method, and evidence certainty was graded using the modified GRADE framework.
resultsOur analysis included 4905 CLL patients. Dysregulated miRNAs were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.41), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.82), and time to treatment (TTT) (HR: 2.39) in CLL patients. Dysregulation of lncRNAs was linked to poorer OS (HR: 2.76) and earlier TTT initiation (HR: 2.53). Additionally, dysregulation of circRNAs was associated with poorer OS (HR: 3.91).
conclusionOur comprehensive meta-analysis results showed that dysregulation of ncRNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs, was associated with poor clinical outcomes in parameters such as OS, PFS, and TTT, identifying them as moderate prognostic markers for CLL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.