Observational studyBMC public health2025
A comparison of anthropometric indicators in predicting the incidence of diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia in Finland: a 22-year observational study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the rising global prevalence of obesity and its strong association with type 2 diabetes, this study aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of various anthropometric indicators in predicting the incidence of type 2 diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia (IH) over a 22-year period. Due to the limitations of body mass index as a predictive marker, the study assesses alternative metrics, including waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), waist circumference (WC), and relative fat mass (RFM), to determine their predictive power for type 2 diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia.
methodsThe cohort comprised 1168 adults (aged ≥ 50 years) from Savitaipale, Finland. Data collection included clinical and laboratory assessments and questionnaires at baseline and at the 10-, and 22-year follow-ups. The incidence of type 2 diabetes and IH was assessed via a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test and health care registry data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) metrics were used to evaluate the predictive power of each indicator, stratified by sex.
resultsWHR had the highest predictive accuracy for type 2 diabetes in men (AUC = 0.70), whereas RFM and WHtR were equally predictive in women (AUC = 0.68). For IH, RFM and WHR were most predictive in men, and WHtR in women. Combining multiple indicators improved the sensitivity of type 2 diabetes prediction.
conclusionsAlternative anthropometric indicators offer comparable predictive value and show potential for individualised type 2 diabetes and IH risk assessment. Sex-specific cutoffs and a multi-indicator approach could be used to improve screening and early intervention strategies, potentially improving public health management of diabetes risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.