ArticleBMC medicine2025
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of maternal postnatal healthcare examinations in England: an OpenSAFELY interrupted time series analysis providing evidence of disparity in care access.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical guidance in England currently recommends that women undergo a postnatal health and wellbeing examination with a general practitioner 6-8 weeks after giving birth. The current study aimed to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of maternal postnatal examinations in England over time and its predictors, including socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity.
methodsWith the approval of NHS England, the OpenSAFELY platform was used to access the TPP SystmOne electronic health record (EHR) system for primary care. All records for registered female patients aged 14 to 49 years with a recorded birth coded between January 2019 and August 2023. Monthly rates of postnatal examinations were estimated based on the number of patients with a postnatal-related code within 6, 8 or 12 weeks of birth. Interrupted time-series analysis modelled the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rate of examinations. Characteristics that may influence the likelihood of not having a postnatal examination were estimated using logistic regression.
resultsFor 626,180 patients with births coded, the rate of postnatal examinations increased with length of time after birth. Rates within 8 weeks fell from 368 to 279 per 1000 (↓24.1%) between January and March 2020, recovering to 402 per 1000 by January 2023. The incident rate ratio for the first national lockdown was 0.87 (95%CI 0.81-0.91) for 6 weeks, 0.84 (0.81-0.87) for 8 and 1.06 (1.04-1.08) for 12 weeks. The odds of no examination were affected by ethnicity (Asian or Asian British (OR 1.11, 1.09-1.14)), region (North East (1.39, 1.28-1.37) and West Midlands (1.33, 1.27-1.39)) and deprivation (most deprived (1.43, 1.31-1.37)).
conclusionsMaternal postnatal examinations within the recommended time were negatively affected by the onset of the pandemic. Despite rates improving over time, most failed to occur within the recommended 6-8 weeks. Significant variation in rates exists across NHS regions: rates were lower in ethnic minority groups and in more deprived populations. Addressing these disparities will require a combination of policy changes, financial incentives and targeted, culturally appropriate interventions to ensure equitable access to care for all mothers and infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.