SynthesisBMC public health2025
The weekend warrior phenomenon: comparable mortality reduction to regular exercise with enhanced neuroprotective effects-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerometer-derived "weekend warrior" physical activity pattern and risk of age-related eye diseases: a prospective cohort study.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- Accelerometer-derived "weekend warrior" physical activity pattern and all-cause mortality in individuals with kidney stones: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe "weekend warrior" (WW) physical activity pattern-characterized by low-frequency, high-intensity exercise concentrated in 1-2 sessions per week-has gained popularity, yet its health implications remain controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the benefits and risks of the WW pattern compared to regular or inactive PA regimens, focusing on mortality, cardiometabolic and neurological outcomes.
methodsTwo independent investigators searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from 01/01/1975 to 01/22/2025. Eligible studies compared health outcomes among WW, regularly active (RA), and inactive populations were included. Outcomes included all-cause/cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic disorders, and neurological conditions. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) were calculated by either random-effects model or fixed-effects model, depending on heterogeneity.
resultsAmong the 21 included studies (14 cohort, 7 cross-sectional), WW was associated with reduced all-cause mortality risk versus inactive population (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87, P < 0.0001), comparable to the benefit observed with RA (HR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.78, P < 0.00001). WW was also linked to reduced risks of CVD mortality (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.66-0.97), cancer mortality (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95), and incident CVD (HR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.64-0.82) when compared with inactivity. Notably, WW conferred greater neuroprotective effects than RA (HR = 0.71 vs. 0.76; P < 0.00001), with a substantial risk reduction compared with inactivity (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.65-0.77). Risk of metabolic disease in WW showed a modest decrease (OR = 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.88, P = 0.0004), although no significant improvements were observed in individual metabolic indices.
conclusionCompared with inactivity, the WW pattern offers mortality and cardiometabolic benefits comparable to regular activity, along with uniquely enhanced neuroprotective effects, supporting its viability for time-constrained individuals.
trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42024583406.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.