Evidence mapPaperPMID 41214639Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2025

Exploring endometriosis community needs to co-create the EndoZone digital health platform: a qualitative research study.

Diksha Sirohi, Cecilia Hoi Man Ng, Niranjan Bidargaddi, Helen Slater, Melissa A Parker, Mary Louise Hull, Rebecca O'Hara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diksha SirohiRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, 55 Ground Floor King William Road North Adelaide, North Adelaide, 5006 , Australia. d.sirohi@uqconnect.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4485-7877
Cecilia Hoi Man NgSchool of Clinical Medicine, Medicine and Health, Discipline of Women's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Niranjan BidargaddiDigital Health Research Lab, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Helen SlaterCurtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Melissa A ParkerCanberra Endometriosis Centre, Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, ACT Health, Canberra, Australia.
Mary Louise HullRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, 55 Ground Floor King William Road North Adelaide, North Adelaide, 5006 , Australia.
Rebecca O'HaraRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, 55 Ground Floor King William Road North Adelaide, North Adelaide, 5006 , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that is associated with painful periods and a variety of co-morbid symptoms for 10% of women and people presumed female at birth globally and upto 14% in Australia. Poor community and medical endometriosis awareness commonly leads to the normalisation of symptoms and dismissal of diagnostic or treatment needs. Community members often search for endometriosis information online. We explored the digital needs of those affected by endometriosis to support the co-creation of EndoZone, an evidence-based platform.

methodsThirty-six people participated in eight semi-structured focus group discussions conducted across Australia between March-May 2020. One was conducted face-to-face and the remaining focus groups were conducted online via Zoom conferencing due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Those living with endometriosis (young group aged 16-18 years [n = 9] and the adult group aged ≥ 19 years [n = 19]) and their supporters (parents and partners aged ≥ 18 years (n = 8)) were invited to participate in the focus groups. The discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were thoroughly checked for accuracy. Meaningful codes were extracted and categorised using NVIVO 12 software through a thematic analysis approach. Categories were clustered into meaningful themes.

resultsThe mean duration of focus groups was 1 h 55 min. The average age of those experiencing endometriosis and pelvic pain symptoms was 26.8 years, while the average age of supporters was 39.7 years. Participants primarily lived in major cities (53.6% - those experiencing endometriosis symptoms; 75% - supporters). Three main themes were identified: the need for (1) a central hub of endometriosis information (2), holistic strategies for symptom management and overall wellbeing, and (3) unique features to support the digital user experience.

conclusionThis study demonstrated the value for an evidence-based digital platform for endometriosis in the Australian community. It was identified that different groups such as adolescents, young adults and supporters such as parents and partners, have unique and varied information needs. A digital platform that caters to these needs should incorporate unique tailoring approaches appropriate for each group, providing just-in-time information to manage acute pain episodes and creating a digital endometriosis community network.

trial registrationN/A.

Indexed as

EndometriosisTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAustraliaCOVID-19Digital HealthFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultDesign thinkingDigital healthEndometriosisNeeds assessmentPelvic painReflexive thematic analysisWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41214639
PMCPMC12604226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.