ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Development and multi-center validation of machine learning models based on targeted metabolomics for rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Advancements and Novel Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Bridging Ancestry-Stratified Bias in Pharmacogenomics AI: Toward Metabolomics-Inclusive Multi-Omics Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Nanobiosensors for Rheumatoid Arthritis Biomarkers: Advances and Clinical Translational Potential.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Metabolic reprogramming in sepsis-associated encephalopathy: emerging mechanisms, candidate biomarkers, and future therapeutic directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) remains in urgent need of more effective biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.
methodsIn this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 2,863 blood samples obtained from seven cohorts comprising RA, osteoarthritis (OA), and healthy control (HC) subjects, recruited across five medical centers spanning three geographically diverse regions. Candidate biomarkers were first identified through untargeted metabolomic profiling, and subsequently validated using targeted approaches. Metabolite-based classification models were then developed employing a range of machine learning algorithms.
resultsSix metabolites were ultimately identified as promising diagnostic biomarkers, including imidazoleacetic acid, ergothioneine, N-acetyl-L-methionine, 2-keto-3-deoxy-D-gluconic acid, 1-methylnicotinamide and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Based on these metabolites, we constructed classification models to differentiate RA from both HC and OA groups, and evaluated their performance across multiple independent validation cohorts. In three geographically distinct cohorts, RA vs. HC classifiers demonstrated robust discriminatory power, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranging from 0.8375 to 0.9280, while RA vs. OA classifiers achieved moderate to good accuracy (AUC range: 0.7340–0.8181). Importantly, analysis of the seronegative RA subgroup indicated that the classifier’s performance was independent of serological status. Furthermore, validations conducted across different sample types and analytical platforms confirmed the reproducibility and stability of the models.
conclusionsTaken together, these findings highlight the utility of metabolomics as a complementary approach for improving RA diagnosis and establish a broadly applicable framework for the development of metabolite-based classifiers across diverse and clinically heterogeneous disease contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.