ReviewClinical and translational science2025
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Oncology in Transgender Patients.
Review in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: Pharmacokinetic Considerations for Oncology in Transgender Patients.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy (GAHT) is a cornerstone of transgender care which induces profound physiological changes and significantly impacts pharmacokinetics and drug dosing strategies. This narrative review examines the clinical implications of GAHT, with a particular focus on renal function parameters, biomarkers, and challenges in the oncological setting. Evidence shows that GAHT considerably alters body composition, muscle mass and serum creatinine levels, resulting in fluctuations of standard calculations of creatinine clearance (CrCl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Unfortunately, standardized dosing formulas remain unvalidated in transgender populations, although gender identity should guide renal function estimates and advocate for cautious interpretation and case-by-case assessment. Recent studies underscore the relevance of emerging biomarkers, such as cystatin C, as possible solutions for assessing renal function in transgender patients, since they are less influenced by body mass. Moreover, direct effects of exogenous hormones on renal physiology have also been highlighted, stressing the importance of thorough evaluation of all these factors, in order to ensure the accuracy of dosing algorithms based on gender-affirming hormones. This issue becomes especially important in oncology, considering that improper use of antineoplastic agents may result in under or overdosing, especially for renally excreted or narrow therapeutic index drugs. Overall, this review aims to represent a resounding prompt to a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists that should play a crucial role in implementing safe, evidence-based, and respectful individualized care pathways, particularly in complex clinical scenarios such as oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.