ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
In situ forming hydrogels for colorectal cancer therapy.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carrier-Free Nanoparticles Enhance Photothermal-Immune Therapy via Metabolic Reprogramming in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Research Progress on Natural Polysaccharide Hydrogels in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mucoadhesive oral nanovaccine delivery system with immunomodulatory capacity for synergistic colorectal cancer therapy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Emerging nano-immunotherapeutic strategies achieve metastatic colorectal cancer precision therapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Bio-Polymers Based Functionalized Hydrogel Carriers for Targeted Oncology Therapies: Current Progress and Future Perspectives.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Natural Polymers Based Biocompatible Nanomedicines for Targeting Colon Cancer: Prospects and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In situ forming hydrogels (ISFGs) have emerged as a promising platform for localized drug delivery in colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy, addressing limitations of systemic treatments such as off-target toxicity and poor drug accumulation at tumor sites. These hydrogels undergo sol-gel transitions in response to stimuli (e.g., temperature, pH, redox) to form drug-laden depots within the tumor microenvironment or at the surgical bed. This review outlines recent advances in ISFG materials-including thermosensitive poloxamers, ion-responsive alginates, Schiff-base dynamic networks, and ROS/pH-sensitive polymers-highlighting their injectability, adhesiveness, and biocompatibility. Therapeutically, ISFGs have been successfully engineered to deliver cytotoxic agents, immunomodulators, photosensitizers, and metabolic inhibitors, enabling synergistic chemo-immunotherapy, postoperative cancer vaccines, and tumor microenvironment remodeling. Preclinical studies have demonstrated enhanced antitumor efficacy, reduced recurrence, immune activation, and even systemic abscopal effects, with minimal systemic toxicity. Clinical translation is advancing, with some ISFG systems entering early-phase trials. This review emphasizes ISFGs' unique capacity to combine spatially confined treatment with systemic immune priming, making them ideal for neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or interventional CRC therapy. Future directions include personalized hydrogel-vaccine platforms, multimodal integration (e.g., ablation + immunotherapy), and smart hydrogels tailored to CRC biology. ISFGs thus represent a versatile and translationally promising strategy for improving local tumor control and long-term outcomes in colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.