Evidence mapPaperPMID 41215810Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2025

Predicting active and productive engagement: introducing the index of aging in midlife and beyond (IAM+).

Leah Abrams, Stipica Mudrazija, Barbara Butrica, Rebekah Carpenter, Amanda Sonnega, Dawn Carr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leah AbramsDepartment of Community Health, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-0903
Stipica MudrazijaSchool of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Barbara ButricaUrban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States.
Rebekah CarpenterDepartment of Sociology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States.
Amanda SonnegaInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Dawn CarrDepartment of Sociology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1091-1759

Funding

HRS Yrs29-34: Y33 SSA CoFundingU01AG009740 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Jessica Faul, KENNETH M LANGA · 1990 to 2026
$555.8M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG009740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Indicators of midlife health decline are needed to determine people's ability to engage in meaningful activities as they age and to implement early interventions to improve long-term health trajectories. Existing measures of physiological aging are unidimensional, expensive, difficult to collect, or focused on advanced disability, making it challenging to identify exposures that contribute to accelerate aging beginning in midlife. Research Design and Methods: Using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we developed the Index of Aging in Midlife and Beyond (IAM+), a 10-item scale that accounts for a range of abilities and domains of health using survey items including multimorbidity, functional capacity, and self-reported cognitive, mental, physical, and sensory health. We evaluated overall reliability and variability. Then, we tested the association between physically demanding jobs in ages 51-56 with trajectories of IAM+ scores in midlife and old age. Finally, we considered predictive validity by examining associations between midlife IAM+ scores and later life activity and health outcomes. Results: The IAM+ had acceptable reliability (alpha = 0.739-0.773). Distributions showed substantial variability. Physically demanding jobs were associated with higher IAM+ scores and accelerated increases in scores in midlife; differences in level, but not slopes, were sustained after retirement age. Higher IAM+ scores in midlife predicted reduced engagement in activities 10 years later, including early labor force exits, and predicted allostatic load, frailty, and mortality 20 years later. Discussion and Implications: The IAM+ is an acceptable and accessible new measure for evaluating health in midlife, with many applications for promoting active and productive engagement through later life.

Indexed as

DisabilitiesEmployment and Older WorkersFunction/MobilityHealthy Aging

Identifiers

PMID41215810
PMCPMC12596490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.