ArticleJPRAS open2025
Topographic anatomy and morphometry of the gracilis muscle related to pelvic transposition flaps: Perineal versus transobturatory approach.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rectovaginal fistulas after radiation therapy: treatment options and outcomes - a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic dead space following major surgery is commonly addressed by vertical rectus abdominis muscle flaps, omental flaps, or gracilis muscle flaps. The drawback of the gracilis muscle flap is the limited amount of intrapelvic muscle tissue achieved by classic perineal transposition. This proof-of-principle study evaluates the transobturatory transposition of the gracilis muscle flap as an alternative to the perineal approach by revisiting the topographic and vascular anatomy and comparing the achievable intrapelvic muscle length. Methods: In-situ dissections were conducted in body donors ( Results: The main vascular pedicle (mean length: 8.8 cm, mean entry point: 13.3 cm) of the gracilis muscle (mean length: 37.2 cm) originated predominantly from the deep femoral artery. Transobturatory transposition was technically feasible in all specimens, regardless of vascular pedicle pattern, and resulted in significantly increased mean intrapelvic muscle length compared to perineal transposition (17.8 vs. 14.5 cm). Further increase in intrapelvic muscle length was achieved by pedicle mobilization (20.9 vs. 15.5 cm) and incision of the adductor brevis muscle (additional gain of length: 1.0 cm). Conclusions: Gracilis muscle transposition via the obturator foramen is a viable alternative to the perineal route, achieving greater intrapelvic muscle length. The morphometric data on the topography and vasculature of the gracilis muscle provide a valuable basis to use the transobturatory transposition of the gracilis muscle for the reconstruction of pelvic defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.