Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216049›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Tinea Blepharociliaris: A Case Report.

Siyu Chen, Jierui Wang, Li Changqiang, Yao Zhang

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Siyu ChenDermatology and Venereology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, luzhou, CHN.
Jierui WangDermatology and Venereology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, luzhou, CHN.
Li ChangqiangDermatology and Venereology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, luzhou, CHN.
Yao ZhangDermatology and Venereology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, luzhou, CHN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blepharitis is a prevalent inflammatory disease of the ocular surface, traditionally associated with bacterial infections or helminth mite parasites. However, recent studies have demonstrated that dermatophyte infections of the eyelids can trigger fungal blepharitis, and this condition can be misdiagnosed as eczema or bacterial infections due to its atypical clinical manifestations. In this article, we present a case of fungal blepharitis in a 25-year-old female patient, an isolated brown crust around the eye (atypical lesion), and a six-month history of possible exposure to contaminated cosmetics were the key features distinguishing the case from a bacterial infection. The patient had been administered glucocorticoids inappropriately, resulting in the migration of the lesion. The diagnosis was confirmed through microscopic examination, which revealed the presence of rod-shaped, large, and small spores. The condition was resolved through the administration of oral terbinafine for two weeks. This case emphasizes that tracing the source of contact and identifying subtle signs (e.g., sesame scab) in the medical history are key to the early diagnosis of fungal eyelid infection and to avoid the chronicity caused by misdiagnosis. When determining the cause of blepharitis, particular attention should be paid to a history of recalcitrance to conventional therapy and the presence of atypical lesions, such as brownish crusts.

Indexed as

blepharitisdermatophyte eyelid infectiondermatophytesmicrobiological examinationperiocular fungal infection

Identifiers

PMID41216049
PMCPMC12596822

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.