ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Efficacy and Safety of Xialiqi for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Randomized Trial.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A retrospective cohort study on the improvement of urodynamic parameters and NIH-CPSI scores with Relin granules in BPH patients with high prostatitis-like symptom scores.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men aged ≥50 yr. Xialiqi capsules are a traditional Chinese medicine mainly used for the treatment of moderate BPH-related LUTS. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of Xialiqi treatment for 8 wk in a cohort of 395 patients. Changes in BPH-related LUTS were assessed in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Irritative and obstructive IPSS subscores and secondary efficacy indicators, including quality of life (QoL) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores, were also assessed. Safety and tolerability were assessed in terms of adverse events (AEs) and serious AE. Key findings and limitations: At the final time point of 8 wk, the least-squares treatment difference in IPSS between the Xialiqi and placebo groups was -2.33 (95% confidence interval -3.01 to -1.64). Analysis of covariance results suggested that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of interactions of subgroups or between parameter subgroups. Results for secondary efficacy measures, including Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index and QoL scores, revealed greater improvement with Xialiqi than with placebo. Safety results show that Xialiqi was well tolerated and AEs were mild. Limitations include the lack of long-term follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications: Xialiqi was associated with an improvement in LUTS over an 8-wk period among men with moderate BPH symptoms. Patient summary: We looked at the safety and efficacy of Xialiqi capsules for the treatment of benign enlargement of the prostate gland in a large Chinese population. We found that Xialiqi provides an early improvement in urinary symptoms and prostate enlargement in men with moderate symptoms relating to an enlarged prostate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.