ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Integrating Single-Cell Transcriptome-Wide Mendelian Randomization and Differentially Expressed Gene Analyses to Prioritize Dynamic Immune-Related Drug Targets for Cancers.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding Immune Regulation: From Genetic Variation to Mechanism Through Single-Cell Genomics.Immune network · 2026Review
- The tissue-specific effects of glucose-lowering drug targets on aging mediated through DNA methylation: a multi-omics genetic study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Causal cross-trait mapping at single-cell resolution identifies shared immunogenetic drivers of migraine and Meniere's disease.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- The crotonylation reader DPF2 promotes the development and progression of colon adenocarcinoma through cell-type-specific immune regulation and metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Integrating Single-Cell Transcriptome-Wide Mendelian Randomization and Differentially Expressed Gene Analyses to Prioritize Dynamic Immune-Related Drug Targets for Cancers.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell expression quantitative trait loci data offer promising opportunities to inform immune-related drug development in cancer. However, pleiotropy can complicate causal inference. We introduce MR-DEG, a framework that integrates Mendelian randomization (MR) and differential expressed gene (DEG) to strengthen causal inference. Using eight conventional MR and colocalization methods, we estimated effects of 11 021 dynamic gene expression profiles during CD4+ T cell activation on the risk of six cancer types. This identified 1000 gene-cancer pairs with putative effects (https://www.omicsharbour.com/sc-eqtl-mr). Of these 1000 pairs, 517 involved 205 unique genes that were differentially expressed in relevant cancer tissues based on single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Of these 517 pairs, 265 were classified as likely causal using the conventional MR methods. After applying MR-DEG to the remaining 252 potentially pleiotropic pairs, an additional 89 were classified as likely causal. Sixty-four and 391 of the 1000 original pairs exhibited time- and non-time dependent effects on cancer risk, respectively. Integrating the 1000 gene-cancer pairs of MR findings and clinical trial evidence, we identified 200 pairs corresponding to 33 unique genes that encode drug targets under clinical investigation. These results demonstrate how combining genetic, transcriptomic and clinical trial evidence can reduce pleiotropic bias, and prioritize immune-related drug targets for cancer prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.