ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Bariatric metabolic surgery and cancer risk: Target trial emulation using iterative time distribution matching.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) is a common intervention for severe obesity, yet its effects on cancer risk remain unclear. Observational studies and meta-analyses yield inconsistent findings, while randomized controlled trials often lack adequate follow-up to evaluate cancer outcomes. This study aims to emulate a target trial using observational data, employing a transparent and robust methodology to address this issue. We constructed a large retrospective cohort of adults with obesity in Qatar using electronic medical records from the public health system, with data available from 2018. We developed and applied iterative time distribution matching (ITDM) which is an iterative version of prescription time distribution matching (PTDM) as an improved approach to mitigate immortal time bias. This adaptation facilitated the alignment of time-zero (T0) between BMS recipients and non-recipients. Subsequently, we applied a Cox proportional hazards regression model, controlling for confounders and prognostic covariates, for data analysis. The final study cohort comprised 124,780 individuals aged 30 years and older, including 1,465 who underwent BMS and 1,583 who developed cancer during the follow-up period. The median follow-up duration was 7.79 years (IQR: 4.89-10.85). In the confounder- and prognostic covariate-adjusted Cox model, BMS was associated with a reduced hazard of cancer (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.76). Given potential residual confounding and the limited outcome data, these findings provide preliminary evidence of a protective association and should be interpreted cautiously. This approach emphasizes transparency in trial emulation design, and future studies should focus on specific cancer types and long-term outcomes as additional data become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.