ArticleDiabetologia2026
Association of HbA
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Landscape of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics in Type 1 Diabetes: Narrative Literature Review.JMIR diabetes · 2026Review
- Narrowing the A1c gap: Personalized modeling of HbA1c- continuous glucose monitor discordance in type 1 diabetes.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Five-year systemic complications in diabetic retinopathy with integrated optical coherence tomography angiography and glycated hemoglobin.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThis study aimed to compare the predictive performance of HbA
methodsWe used the data from a previously published longitudinal case-control study that collected CGM data for up to 7 years prior to diagnosis of incident diabetic retinopathy or no retinopathy (control participants) among adults with type 1 diabetes. Mutual information scores (MIS), receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and machine learning models were used to assess the associations of diabetic retinopathy with HbA
resultsThe uGMI demonstrated a stronger association with incident diabetic retinopathy (MIS 0.148) compared with HbA CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe uGMI is a slightly stronger predictor of diabetic retinopathy risk compared with HbA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.