ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
Tertiary lymphoid organ-associated transcriptomic features predict rejection and outcome in kidney transplantation: integrative analysis and experimental validation.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) are ectopic lymphoid structures that arise in chronically inflamed tissues, including renal allografts. While increasingly recognized in kidney transplant biopsies, the molecular features, clinical significance, and prognostic implications of TLOs remain poorly defined. This study aimed to characterize TLO-related immune landscapes and investigate their association with allograft rejection and outcomes using a multi-omics approach. Methods We integrated bulk transcriptomic datasets from multiple kidney transplant cohorts to derive TLO scores using ssGSEA and evaluated their associations with rejection, Banff histology, and graft survival. Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) was employed to identify TLO-based molecular subtypes. Multiple machine learning algorithms were integrated to construct prognostic and diagnostic models. Single-cell RNA sequencing was used to explore the cellular sources and differentiation dynamics of hub TLO-related genes (TRGs). In vivo validation was performed in a rat model of allograft rejection. Results Elevated TLO transcriptional activity was significantly associated with acute rejection and inferior graft survival across independent cohorts. TLO scores correlated positively with Banff lesion severity and the chronic allograft damage index. NMF clustering revealed a rejection-prone molecular subtype with increased immune infiltration and pro-inflammatory signaling. Diagnostic and prognostic models incorporating TLO-related features exhibited strong predictive performance (AUCs > 0.8). Four hub TRGs-CXCL9, CXCL11, CD40, and SH2D1A-were subsequently identified. Single-cell analysis demonstrated dynamic expression of these genes in endothelial, B, and T cell lineages, particularly during transitions toward key TLO-forming immune and stromal phenotypes. Experimental validation confirmed upregulation of hub TRGs in rejecting rat allografts. Conclusion TLOs represent immunologically active structures that shape intragraft immune architecture and contribute to rejection and chronic injury in kidney transplantation. Our study provides the first comprehensive multi-omics framework linking TLO features with clinical outcomes and identifies TRG-based biomarkers with diagnostic and prognostic utility. These findings support the integration of TLO-informed tools into transplant immunomonitoring and therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.