ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
Parental Perspectives on the Use of Smartwatch Activity Trackers by Young Children: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmartwatch activity trackers are devices that measure physical activity levels with features that aim to encourage physically active behaviors. These devices have shown promise for increasing physical activity levels and reducing sedentary behaviors among school-aged children, adolescents, and adults. Recently, commercially available products have been adapted so that they are suitable for use by preschool-aged children. However, it is unclear whether the intended use of these devices is feasible and effective in young children.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to explore parents' perspectives on the use of smartwatch activity trackers by young children.
methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 22 parents (17/22, 77% female) of children aged 3-5 years. Interviews explored perspectives on the feasibility of their children wearing the devices, implications of use by young children, and how families could make use of these devices to support their children's physically active behaviors. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsParents perceived that the use of these devices by young children is feasible, with developmental stage or abilities and personality or temperament being important individual determinants of feasibility. However, parents expressed concerns related to the devices providing extrinsic motivation to move, being disruptive or distracting, being a burden on parents, and for the safety and privacy of their child's information. Most parents believed that young children are inherently active and do not need devices to support physical activity. Furthermore, most parents expressed an interest in knowing how physically active their children were and thought that there may be a role for these devices for children who are less physically active.
conclusionsParents reported developmental stage or abilities and temperament as relevant considerations related to the feasibility of smartwatch activity tracker use by young children. Parents also indicated that there is a potential role for these devices in young, less active children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.