Evidence mapPaperPMID 41217817Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

Perspectives and Preferences on Developing a Digital Human System for Intrinsic Capacity Monitoring Underpinned by World Health Organization's Integrated Care for Older People Guideline: Qualitative Study.

Zehui Xuan, Yirou Niu, Yanling Wang, Zun Wang, Jie Zhao, Hong Chang, Qian Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zehui XuanSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5898-9415
Yirou NiuSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8439-8057
Yanling WangSchool of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-4245
Zun WangDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Youanmen Community Healthcare Center, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9641-6003
Jie ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6062-899X
Hong Chang *Department of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6020-2726
Qian Xiao *School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-2863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) pathway, based on an assessment of intrinsic capacity (IC), aims to achieve dynamic monitoring of the functional capacity of older adults and to provide personalized care in the community. Digital human technology, incorporating multisensory interaction, has the potential to assist older adults in self-monitoring their IC, thereby alleviating the burden of longitudinal monitoring on community health workers.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the perspectives and preferences of older adults and health care professionals on developing a digital human system for IC monitoring. The focus of the study was on the degree of acceptance, potential functionality, and application environments to provide design solutions for system development.

methodsA qualitative descriptive study design was conducted in Beijing, China, with purposively selected older adults (n=20) and health care professionals (n=17) who participated in 31 semistructured individual interviews and 1 focus group interview between August 2024 and January 2025. The health information technology acceptance model (HITAM) was used to develop the interview outline, and an inductive-deductive content analysis approach was adopted to analyze the collected data.

resultsThe interviews yielded 4 themes with associated 11 subthemes: (1) take stock of IC: perception and response to the decline of IC, current limitations of IC monitoring; (2) measurement factors for system acceptance and adoption: efficiency expectation, effort overload, and foundation of trust; (3) perceived value of the digital human in the system: function enhances monitoring effect, style promotes the execution ability of monitoring, and attitude soothes for emotional regrets; and (4) promote ecology of the system: linkage between community scenes, establishing health responsibility, and promoting equity in digital health. Most participants believed that the functions and advantages of digital humans would enhance the convenience and effectiveness of IC monitoring and support older adults to self-manage IC. However, the accessibility, interaction challenges, and trustworthiness of such digital human systems for older adults would require system developers and community health care workers to make efforts in terms of technology and interpersonal relationship building.

conclusionsThe digital human system for IC monitoring could potentially reduce the workload of community health workers while providing older adults an accessible way to objectively understand functional abilities. The digital human would be uniquely valuable in improving monitoring effectiveness and adherence, creating emotional connections with older adults, and predicting functional abilities. Additionally, the system's predictive and simulation functions could optimize the implementation of ICOPE by coordinating community scenarios and enhancing the professional capacity of health workers. However, challenges such as geographical and functional segregation, cognitive changes, and limited digital literacy, which may exacerbate digital health inequalities, still need to be addressed.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedAgedAged, 80 and overChinaDigital TechnologyFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcommunitydigital humandigital technologyIntegrated Care for Older Peopleintrinsic capacityolder adultsqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID41217817
PMCPMC12648136

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.