ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Pleiotropy and the evolutionary stability of plastic phenotypes: a geometric framework.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity allows organisms to express different traits in response to different environmental or genetic conditions. Understanding the evolution of conditional phenotypes is challenging because they are not expressed by all members of a population, which allows for the accumulation of deleterious variation due to a reduced efficacy of purifying selection. Theory suggests pleiotropic effects help prevent the decay of conditional phenotypes by exposing the variation accrued in one context to the effects of purifying selection in an alternative context. However, existing frameworks for describing the evolutionary dynamics of conditional phenotypes are limited in their ability to flexibly model the complex pleiotropic architectures that often underlie conditional phenotypes. To help improve our understanding of the evolutionary stability of conditional phenotypes, here we describe a geometric model that allows for explicit modeling of different fitness optima for conditional and alternative phenotypes, as well as their underlying pleiotropic associations. Using stochastic simulations and mathematical analyses, we show that this model recapitulates and elaborates on existing predictions regarding the role of pleiotropy in maintaining conditional phenotypes. Specifically, we found that more pleiotropic conditional phenotypes experience decreased rates of decay in fitness over periods of inexpression, the effects of which are comparable for phenotypes that are spatially and temporally conditional. Furthermore, the functional form of the relationship between conditional phenotype expression pattern and decay rate is mediated by pleiotropic effect, which provides more explicit hypotheses of when pleiotropic constraint is expected to play a significant role in the evolutionary maintenance of conditional phenotypes. Finally, we found that when pleiotropic architectures evolve over periods of conditional phenotype inexpression, decoupling from other phenotypes readily evolves and facilitates decay in fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.