ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2025
Digital dementia and testing of cognitive intervention for degenerating neural networks.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of effective interventions for neurodegenerative disorders, such as posterior cortical atrophy (a visual Alzheimer's variant), remains to be a significant clinical challenge. We introduce a computational framework using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as in silico models to simulate visual system degeneration and evaluate intervention strategies. By modeling controlled synaptic decay and comparing three distinct retraining approaches, random data (control), accuracy-based, and entropy-based, we assess impacts on classification performance and neural representation geometry. Our results demonstrate that accuracy-based retraining outperformed other strategies, maintaining model performance and preserving optimal manifold geometry during intermediate degeneration stages. This computational analysis supports prioritizing accuracy-targeted interventions for cognitive compensation. Our framework enables rapid evaluation of intervention efficacy while elucidating computational principles underlying neurodegeneration and recovery. This approach offers a platform for refining strategies to slow visual-cognitive decline in neurodegenerative diseases, bridging mechanistic insights with clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.