Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219264›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of sequential and thermodynamic features of pre-miRNA in insects with various organisms and applying XGBoost for one-vs-rest binary classification.

Adhiraj Nath, Utpal Bora

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adhiraj NathDepartment of BSBE, IIT Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 784039, India. adhiraj@alumni.iitg.ac.in.
Utpal BoraDepartment of BSBE, IIT Guwahati, North Guwahati, Assam, 784039, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNAs are found to regulate various biological processes which are produced from precursor microRNA. As the length of such microRNA are small, homology-based searching is not very useful. Hence, various machine learning based tools have been designed for prediction of such hairpin loops using various thermodynamic and sequential features. In this research, we discuss about the comparative statistical analysis of various features used the in development of machine learning based predictive tools. The sequence features of insect precursor microRNA were compared with precursor microRNA of other available organisms. We initially established that features such as Length, GC content, Minimum Free Energy (MFE) of folding, etc., differs in insects as compared to other organisms using Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test. We further trained a predictive model for one-vs-rest binary classification using XGBoost between insects, human, monocots, aves, ruminants, sauria, dogs and rodents. We performed PCA and retained 14 principal components for classification using cumulative explained variance. Various parameters of XGBoost was tuned with 5-fold CV and the parameter values with highest CV score were considered. We used independent held-out data test the models. The accuracy of insect, monocots, rodents, human, ruminants, sauria, aves and dogs was found to be 0.8549, 0.8626, 0.6835, 0.7005, 0.8875, 0.6972, 0.7591 and 0.6588 respectively. This shows that ancestral lineage specific ML models can be developed for detection of precursor microRNA for different classes of organism.

Indexed as

InsectaMicroRNAsRNA PrecursorsAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningThermodynamicsMicroRNAsRNA PrecursorsInsectsMachine learningMicroRNAXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID41219264
PMCPMC12606329

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.