Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219305›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Circulating miR-19, miR-27a, and miR-200c as novel biomarkers for resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: a pilot study.

B Baušys, K Rauduvytė, A Šeštokaitė, K Bičkaitė, K Žukauskaitė, R Stulpinas, R Baušys, A Baušys, R Sabaliauskaitė, S Jarmalaitė

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04223401 (Personalized Trimodal Prehabilitation for Gastrectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04223401 naunknown statusnot on this map

Personalized Trimodal Prehabilitation for Gastrectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Center Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros KlinikosRan2020 to 2023Enrolled128ConditionsGastric CancerArmsPrehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

B BaušysInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania. bernardas.bausys@gmail.com.
K RauduvytėFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
A ŠeštokaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
K BičkaitėFaculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
K ŽukauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
R StulpinasNational Center of Pathology, Affiliate of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics, Vilnius, Lithuania.
R BaušysNational Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
A BaušysInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
R SabaliauskaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.
S JarmalaitėInstitute of Biosciences, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 7, LT-10257, Vilnius, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard approach for treating locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), but resistance in some patients can result in treatment toxicity and surgical delays without therapeutic benefit. Identifying biomarkers predictive of NAC response is crucial for personalized treatment strategies. This study evaluated circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as potential biomarkers for NAC response. Materials and methods Plasma samples from 39 GC patients undergoing NAC followed by gastrectomy (NCT04223401) were collected before treatment. Four miRNAs (miR-19a, miR-21, miR-27a, miR-200c) were analyzed via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. NAC response was assessed in histological specimens using the Becker tumor regression grade (TRG), which classifies patients as Responders (TRG 1-2) or Non-responders (TRG 3). Results Among 39 patients, 20 (51%) were Responders, and 19 (49%) were Non-responders. miR-19a, miR-21, and miR-200c were significantly upregulated in Non-responders (p < 0.05). ROC analysis revealed miR-19a (AUC: 0.693), miR-21 (AUC: 0.700), and miR-200c (AUC: 0.772) as predictive of resistance. Univariate analysis revealed a correlation between higher levels of miR-19a, miR-21, and miR-200c and a low neutrophil count, with increased resistance risk. Multivariate analysis confirmed miR-200c as an independent predictor of resistance (OR: 20.90; 95% CI: 1.54-283.73). Conclusions This pilot study identifies circulating miR-19a, miR-21, and miR-200c as novel biomarkers for poor NAC response in GC, providing a foundation for personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDrug Resistance, NeoplasmMicroRNAsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPilot ProjectsROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN19A microRNA, humanMIRN200 microRNA, humanMIRN21 microRNA, humanMIRN27 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID41219305
PMCPMC12614783

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.