ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2026
Signal control during tissue regeneration in adult animals.
Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A transgenic zebrafish for spatiotemporal optogenetic activation of FGF/ERK signaling.Biology open · 2026Article
- Zebrafish relatives as models for functional comparative genetics and genomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Regeneration programs buffer genetic defects in animal development.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- A transgenic zebrafish for direct optogenetic activation of FGF/ERK signaling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The puzzling duality of mesenchymal stem cells and adipocytes in bone marrow and ageing.npj aging · 2026Review
- 4D multimodal wound healing atlas reveals organ-level controls of repair phase transitions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tissue regeneration has historically been the subject of intense scientific scrutiny, from basic biology to applications in regenerative medicine. Use of model organisms and cutting-edge technologies have uncovered various mechanisms of regeneration, but understanding how signals are regulated spatiotemporally to renew lost structures at scale remains a challenge. Recent insights into chromatin structure and enhancer regulation, immune-tissue crosstalk, bioelectric and metabolic cues and quantitative modelling are broadening and reshaping our understanding of how tissues repair and renew. The evolution of cutting-edge tools for in vivo profiling and tracking of single cells is providing unprecedented dynamic views of regeneration across scales. Here, we synthesize the current knowledge of signal control in regeneration, with emphasis on conceptual advances, technical innovations and future directions for a more quantitative understanding of regenerative biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.