Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219803›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Effect of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a study protocol of double-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Fei Wang, Hongwei Zhang, Xilin Peng, Mengxue Liu, Huaiming Wang, Yang Song, Xue Jia, Tao Zhu, Yihao Zhu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06138041 (Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06138041 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

Effect of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: a Double-center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSichuan Cancer Hospital and Research InstituteRan2025 to 2025Enrolled770ConditionsPostoperative Pneumonia, Postoperative Pulmonary Atelectasis, Postoperative Pulmonary EdemaArmsintravenous lidocaine infusion, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610000, China.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xilin PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Mengxue LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610000, China.
Huaiming WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yang SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Xue JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Integrative Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Tao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yihao ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 610041, China. yhzhu@cmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5108-2961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEsophageal cancer is the eighth most prevalent malignant tumor in the world and has the sixth highest mortality rate. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) are one of the most common complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). The non-local anesthetic effects of lidocaine have been widely reported, but only a few studies have focused on its effects on lung protection in MIE. This study is designed to test the hypothesis that intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion can reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing MIE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this double-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled superiority trial, 770 participants from three centers will be randomly assigned to two groups, namely the lidocaine group and the placebo group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the incidence of PPCs within 7 days following surgery. The secondary outcomes include the incidence of (1) respiratory infection; (2) respiratory failure; (3) pneumothorax; (4) atelectasis; (5) pleural effusion; (6) bronchospasm; (7) aspiration pneumonitis; (8) anastomotic fistula; (9) moderate to severe pain within 24 and 48 h at rest and when coughing; (10) additional rescue analgesics use. DISCUSSION: This study aims to address a significant gap in the prevention of PPCs in patients undergoing MIE for esophageal cancer. PPCs are common and can negatively impact recovery and survival outcomes, making effective prevention strategies crucial. While lidocaine's non-local anesthetic properties, including anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, have been well-documented, few studies have focused on its role in lung protection during MIE. By assessing the incidence of PPCs and other secondary outcomes, this trial seeks to determine whether intraoperative lidocaine infusion can offer a novel, non-invasive approach to reducing PPC risk and improving overall postoperative recovery. If lidocaine proves effective, this study will provide a new way to improve patient outcomes, particularly for those with high PPCs risk. Furthermore, the results could expand the scope of lidocaine use in surgical settings, suggesting a potentially low-cost and accessible intervention for broader perioperative lung protection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT06138041 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registration date: 2024-10-22). STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY: This study will provide a reliable conclusion investigating the effect of intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. The study includes an appropriate sample size and a double-center, randomized, and double-blind placebo-controlled design, which reduces potential bias. The full analysis set consists of all participants according to the intention-to-treat principle and the per-protocol set will be both performed. Per-protocol analysis will be used for sensitivity analyses. Intravenous lidocaine infusion is only continued until patients are transferred out of the post-anesthesia care unit, while the benefit of prolonged infusion in the ward will not be investigated.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyLidocaineLung DiseasesMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsAgedDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicAnesthetics, LocalLidocaine

Identifiers

PMID41219803
PMCPMC12606923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.