Trial reportAIDS research and therapy2025
Enhancing HIV/AIDS knowledge and attitudes through a healthcare-school collaborative model: a study among Shanghai high school students.
Trial report in AIDS research and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the effectiveness of a healthcare-school collaborative intervention model in improving HIV/AIDS-related knowledge and attitudes among high school students.
methodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted with 444 Grade 10-11 students from a Shanghai high school. Participants were cluster-randomized into two groups: a traditional model group (n = 299, routine health education) and a new model intervention group (n = 145, receiving healthcare-school collaborative interventions, including on-campus clinics, peer education, and digital outreach). Self-administered questionnaires measured outcomes at baseline and after the intervention.
resultsBaseline data revealed high awareness of HIV transmission routes (91.6%) but lower understanding of non-transmission routes (75.88%). Post-intervention, the new model group demonstrated significantly higher knowledge rates than the traditional group in critical areas: recognizing that HIV is not transmitted through dining together (92.91% vs. 85.71%), mosquito bites (90.55% vs. 34.59%), mother-to-child transmission (96.85% vs. 89.85%), and condom effectiveness (85.04% vs. 75.19%) (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, 87.4% of students in the new model group expressed willingness to maintain friendships with peers living with HIV/AIDS, surpassing the traditional group (78.57%, P = 0.035). Knowledge scores were significantly higher in the new model group (9.28 ± 1.27 vs. 8.46 ± 1.27, P < 0.05). Satisfaction surveys showed high approval for the intervention, with 89.76% of participants satisfied with the format and 83.46% perceiving it as useful.
conclusionThe healthcare-school collaborative model, integrating on-site health services, multimedia education, and behavioral guidance, effectively enhances HIV/AIDS knowledge, reduces stigma, and fosters healthy sexual attitudes among adolescents. This model offers a scalable and effective framework for school-based HIV prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.