Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219987›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

Northern populations of Finnish raccoon dogs are active at the range edge and unhindered by movement boundaries.

Purabi Deshpande, Pyry Toivonen, Vesa Selonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Purabi DeshpandeDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland. ppdesh@utu.fi.
Pyry ToivonenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland.
Vesa SelonenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, FI-20014, Finland.

Funding

Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Sotka-projectResearch Council of Finland 357199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying movements of invasive species is important for controlling their spread into new areas and understanding how their populations can be controlled in the regions where they have already spread. Additionally, animals at the range edge are known to behave differently from those at the range core. Such differences in movement behaviour can further affect the spread of a species into new areas. Here, we use data from GPS tracking of 103 individuals of the invasive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Finland to examine the movement of the species. First, we determine whether movement distances differ in the range edge and range core. Next, focusing on dispersing individuals, we explore whether their movements are directional. Finally, we investigate whether the dispersal by raccoon dogs is affected by movement boundaries, such as waterbodies and roads. We show that raccoon dogs at the range edge move larger distances than those in the range core. The dispersing individuals do not show a preference to moving in any particular direction. Finally, we do not find evidence for waterbodies and roads acting as movement boundaries for raccoon dogs. Our results indicate that raccoon dogs are very active at the range edge and highlight how the movement distances of a species might be underestimated if individuals from the invasion front are not studied. The raccoon dog’s spread is likely to continue into favourable habitats and not be hindered by roads or water bodies putting areas at higher latitudes and surrounding countries at the risk of invasion.

Indexed as

DispersalInvasion frontInvasive speciesMesopredatorsMovement ecologyNyctereutes procyonoidesResource selection functions

Identifiers

PMID41219987
PMCPMC12606842

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.